SPRINGFIELD — With the Department of Homeland Security now cracking down on “sanctuary jurisdictions,” leaders in targeted cities in Western Massachusetts are urging the president to reconsider or, in some cases, to check his facts.
Springfield, Amherst, Northampton and Holyoke made the new DHS “sanctuary jurisdiction” list, as well as Hampshire, Franklin and Berkshire counties.
After learning of the new list, local municipal leaders pushed back at the federal administration.
“I’ve always maintained we are not a sanctuary city. I vetoed a City Council vote to make us a sanctuary, and the council overrode it,” said Springfield Mayor Domenic J. Sarno.
“I’m all for legal immigration. I’m first generation. But there used to be an orderly process,” he said, referring to his parents. “The federal government walked away from this process and left it to cities and states.”
Springfield, instead, has a “welcoming city” ordinance that looks a whole lot like a sanctuary city rule — primarily prohibiting city police from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations that have ramped up under President Donald J. Trump. He made a campaign vow to clamp down on undocumented immigrants.
The list was published Wednesday on Homeland Security’s website and breaks down its targets by state, county and city.
In Massachusetts, there are a dozen communities on the list:
AmherstBostonCambridgeChelseaConcordHolyokeLawrenceNewtonNorthamptonOrleansSomervilleSpringfield
“Was I surprised we were on the hit list? No. But I’m hoping President Trump and his team will take another look at Springfield’s history and my leadership in particular on this issue,” Sarno said during an interview Friday.
Massachusetts as a whole makes the sanctuary list, probably, because of the Lunn decision, a 2017 court case that bars police from taking people into custody over a civil offense, said Sarang Sekhavat, chief of staff for the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.
Homeland Security’s list of a dozen Massachusetts communities doesn’t match up with Northeastern University’s comprehensive list of sanctuary communities, he noted.
“(It’s) wonky,” Sekhavat said. “People are really wondering where they came up with this list.”
Massachusetts counties don’t have governments of their own, for instance.
And in Virginia, one conservative leaning county made the list because it proclaims itself as a gun-friendly “2nd Amendment Sanctuary” on its website, Sekhavat said.
“If the consequences of this weren’t so serious, it would be ridiculous and worthy of mockery,” he said.
The list came on the heels of Trump’s executive order late last month to produce a list of immigrant-friendly communities. The list released two days ago said it is a matter of public safety.
The list is labeled as Sanctuary Jurisdictions Defying Federal Immigration Law, and posits the following: “Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in peril,” read a statement from Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.
The list also came the same day Amherst town officials confirmed the arrests of two people by ICE on May 28.
“The town of Amherst and the Amherst Police Department did not participate in either of these incidents and have not participated in any federal immigration enforcement actions that have occurred. ICE operated independently from the town with no prior notification. No additional information is available at this time,” a statement from the town manager read.
It’s unclear whether the list will have any teeth. It includes no directives other than a pledge to send letters to towns and cities that appear to be immigrant-friendly.
A federal judge in California ruled the Trump administration is not constitutionally allowed to limit federal funding to states and cities that have opposing politics.
“The town of Amherst is a sanctuary community and as such shall not cooperate with ICE,” the statement continued.
Holyoke Mayor Joshua A. Garcia speaks to his aide, Stephen Fay, on May 19. (Douglas Hook / The Republican, File)Douglas Hook
In Holyoke, Mayor Joshua A. Garcia said the definition of a sanctuary city is murky.
“There is no universally accepted definition of a ‘sanctuary city,’ and if one exists, Holyoke should not be considered one. Nowhere in my executive order does the word ‘sanctuary’ appear. The order simply directs our police officers to follow the law and not act as federal immigration agents. If it is the case where an individual poses a legitimate public safety concern, such as being charged with or convicted of a serious or violent crime, they could be held longer on a detainer,” he said.
Garcia in January sent out strong statements, urging support for immigrants. He worries that undocumented immigrants might fear calling police in emergencies, given the national climate.
“As mayor, my responsibility is to keep everyone in Holyoke safe, residents and visitors alike. We cannot afford to have anyone afraid to call 911 or help police because they fear deportation. Public safety depends on trust, communication and cooperation, and that is exactly what we are working to protect,” Garcia said in the statement.
ICE sweeps have been scattered in Western Massachusetts, and the federal agency has been largely cloak-and-dagger about its operations, rejecting media inquiries.
In Northampton, Mayor Gina-Louise Sciarra revived a statement she released in November.
“The enforcement of federal immigration laws is outside the authority of local law enforcement, and Northampton has a long-standing policy of non-cooperation with such actions to the extent permissible by law,” she said.
A chief of staff said Sciarra had no further comment.
Staff writer Jim Kinney contributed to this report.
